Connection of Featuresof Reflective-Phenomenological Assessment with the Development of Reflectivity at Master’s Students

2017

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.17759/psyedu.2016080407
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article presents the main results of the study level of reflexivity and reflexive-type phenomenological judgments graduate alumni. Scientific hypothesis was that pronounced, argumentative type of reflective-phenomenological judgments associated with high reflexivity graduate students as future university teachers. The study involved 62 undergraduates scientific and pedagogical direction of the second year students of different specialties multidisciplinary university. It is proved that reflexivity is positively related to the student's ability to reason and reflexivity as a property of the individual leads to a more stable formation of the student's ability thoughtfully, consciously, to present arguments instructional information. High-reflexivity, the capacity for subjective expression, deployed, reasoned judgment allows prospective teachers to the university to express independent opinions, develop the ability to verbally express their emotions from immersion in the problems of the professional reality.