Comparison of Distributed Computing Approaches to Complexity of n-gram Extraction

2016

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.5220/0005943000250030
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In this paper we compare different technologies that support distributed computing as a means to address complex tasks. We address the task of n-gram text extraction which is a big computational given a large amount of textual data to process. In order to deal with such complexity we have to adopt and implement parallelization patterns. Nowadays there are several patterns, platforms and even languages that can be used for the parallelization task. We implemented this task on three platforms: (1) MPJ Express, (2) Apache Hadoop, and (3) Apache Spark. The experiments were implemented using two kinds of datasets composed by: (A) a large number of small files, and (B) a small number of large files. Each experiment uses both datasets and the experiment repeats for a set of different file sizes. We compared performance and efficiency among MPJ Express, Apache Hadoop and Apache Spark. As a final result we are able to provide guidelines for choosing the platform that is best suited for each kind of data set regarding its overall size and granularity of the input data.