Estimating the Exposures of Major Financial Institutions to the Global Credit Risk Transfer Market

2007

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3905/jfi.2007.700213
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Credit risk transfer (CRT) instruments offer important diversification benefits but may magnify shocks since they disperse risk, across both financial and non-financial sectors. Exposures to CRT instruments, such as credit derivatives, are difficult to track, given the lack of public data on this activity. This article proposes a simple method for estimating institutional exposures to credit derivatives, using readily-available and timely financial markets data. The results suggest the existence of a strong “home bias” in the exposures of institutions. Moreover, major financial institutions tend to have less risky exposures in Europe, but have riskier exposures in North America. Importantly, the findings on individual institutions appear to have been broadly borne out by revelations during the recent turmoil in global credit markets. TOPICS:CLOs, CDOs, and other structured credit, credit default swaps, financial crises and financial market history