Swelling Behavior and Complex Formation Ability of Ternary Amphoteric Gels based on Allylamine Derivatives and Maleic Acid

2005

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1002/mame.200500080
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract Summary: The swelling behavior of an amphoteric gel composed of 50 mol‐% of maleic acid (MA), 25 mol‐% of N,N′‐dimethyldiallylammonium chloride (DMDAAC) and 25 mol‐% of diallylamine (DAA) was studied in aqueous and aqueous‐salt solutions. The isoelectric point (IEP) of the MA‐DMDAAC‐DAA gel determined from swelling experiments was about pH 4.6. Considerable gel swelling with increasing ionic strength was observed at the IEP. Dynamic swelling properties of the amphoteric gel in water with and without added salt were measured at various pH values including the IEP. The swelling behavior of the amphoteric gel was found to depend on the ionization state of the functional groups. It can be described by either a relaxation‐controlled or non‐Fickian (anomalous) mechanism. Swelling‐deswelling properties of the amphoteric gel were also studied in mixtures of water and organic solvents. The amphoteric gel was able to complex sodium poly(styrene sulfonate), sodium lauryl sulfate, the cationic drug richlocain, and the bivalent transition metal ions Cu2+, Ni2+, Co2+, and Zn2+. The sorption of polyelectrolyte, surfactant, drug, and metal ions by the amphoteric gel is accompanied by the contraction of the gel network. Partial release of the cationic drug molecules entrapped into the gel volume takes place at the IEP of the amphoteric gel with low activation energy, while neither the anionic polyelectrolyte nor the surfactants are released from the gel interior at the IEP. The swelling‐shrinking behavior of gel‐polyelectrolyte and gel‐surfactant complexes in dependence of pH and ionic strength of the outer solution is similar. magnified image