MANIPULATIVE POTENTIAL OF LEXICAL UNITS (BASED ON THE MATERIAL OF THE KAZAKH MASS MEDIA DISCOURSE)

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51889/2020-2.1728-7804.20
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article considers the issues of mass media manipulation. Due to the enormous influence of mass media discourse on public consciousness and behavior, mass media are often used as a tool for informational and psychological impact on society and pose an information threat to it. In this regard, the relevance of studying the phenomenon of manipulativeness, as well as recognizing manipulative texts by machine processing on a large corpus of texts, is beyond doubt. At the same time, given the hidden nature of manipulation, it is rather difficult to determine such mechanisms and means of manipulation that can become valid metrics for diagnosing the level of manipulativeness of news. This article defines the concept of manipulativeness, and also considers some lexical markers from the entire complex of manipulative means that have a high manipulative potential. The research material consisted of 500 manipulative publications, selected by linguistic experts after careful reading and observation of the linguistic material.