Environmental Education and Management: Exclusive, Inclusive, and Indigenous Doctrines

2020

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/459/5/052086
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract Environmental education of the population is an important part of environmental management. Environmental education is necessary not only for entities directly involved in the processes of nature protection (environmental performance) and in processes harmful to nature (use and processing of resources and waste management of industrial technical and agricultural production and domestic consumption of production products). It is necessary for all people, including as subjects included in different types of relationships and in various systems as direct participants in environmental protection measures and/or victims of natural disasters, as stakeholders and as representatives of indigenous cultures, etc. In Russia an exclusive doctrine has been established nature conservation: the leading role was played by states that determine the forms of protection and exploitation of natural resources, the development and compliance with environmental standards, and the requirements for environmental education of the population. Other model is in addition to the system of national parks and other protected areas, indigenous community protected areas are formed and developed. Thus, not only the doctrine of an isolating type (care of nature is the concern of the state, not of man) is popular here, but also the indigenous, participatory doctrine (“live on your land - study it and take care of it”). This model assumes a systemic, multi-level and multicomponent interaction of subjects of various types, relatively clearer than in the first case, ideas about personal, group and organizational responsibility in the field of nature protection. In the intermediate phase of the transition from one doctrine to another, there is an inclusive model. The basic principle is everyone cares about everything. In this case, the search for productive and effective management systems and the development of the ecological culture of individuals, groups and organizations is usually observed.