Term Semantics from a Cognitive Viewpoint

2015

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.683
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The report is devoted to the use of methods of cognitive analysis for identification of relations between term semantics and conceptual structures of expert knowledge storage. Conceptual educations, cognitive formats of storage of expert knowledge and language cognition in their interaction are considered in the article as causing formation of terminological nominative units. The authors analyze mechanisms and tendencies that are characteristic of different categories representation and consider the distinctive relationship between categories representation and the use of productive term elements that in some cases leads to the establishment of explicit term oppositions. Some regularities in different terminologies related to the issue are discussed. We also examine possible reasons that govern the choice of word to serve as a term element that is relevant for a particular category.