On the spectrum of well-defined restrictions and extensions for the Laplace operator

2014

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1134/s0001434614030183
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The study of the spectral properties of operators generated by differential equations of hyperbolic or parabolic type with Cauchy initial data involve, as a rule, Volterra boundary-value problems that are well posed. But Hadamard’s example shows that the Cauchy problem for the Laplace equation is ill posed. At present, not a single Volterra well-defined restriction or extension for elliptic-type equations is known. Thus, the following question arises: Does there exist a Volterra well-defined restriction of a maximal operator $$\hat L$$ or a Volterra well-defined extension of a minimal operator L 0 generated by the Laplace operator? In the present paper, for a wide class of well-defined restrictions of the maximal operator $$\hat L$$ and of well-defined extensions of the minimal operator L 0 generated by the Laplace operator, we prove a theorem stating that they cannot be Volterra.