Defect and Interface Engineering of VO2 for Reconfigurable Nanophotonics

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/nano16181132
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Vanadium dioxide (VO2) is a prominent active material for reconfigurable nanophotonics because its reversible metal-insulator transition produces large changes in complex refractive index and electrical conductivity. The usable phase contrast, however, is not an intrinsic constant: it is governed by defect type and location, vanadium valence, oxygen stoichiometry, strain, crystallographic orientation, dimensionality, and the chemical, electrical, optical, and thermal boundary conditions imposed by interfaces. This focused narrative review develops a defect- and interface-centred framework linking VO2 phase physics to device-level optical modulation. Bulk, surface, grain-boundary, and heterointerface defects are distinguished, together with their effects on carriers, V-V bonding, phase stability, optical loss, and cycling reliability. Epitaxial and polycrystalline films, ultrathin layers, and nanostructures are compared across the visible, near-infrared, mid-infrared, and terahertz ranges. Thermal, optical, electrical, electrostatic, electrochemical, ionic, strain, and ferroelectric activation pathways are then compared according to volatility, speed, retention, reversibility, and endurance. Representative free-space metasurfaces, guided-wave modulators, adaptive emitters, and photonic memories are benchmarked separately to avoid mixing incomparable performance definitions. The resulting analysis shows that optical modulation, insertion loss, thermal overhead, ambient stability, and endurance are coupled through the same defect and interface landscape. Progress, therefore, requires coordinated control of phase purity, local chemistry, interface energetics, thermal transport, and architecture-specific performance reporting.