Punitiveness in the global east: Convict settler colonialism and attitudes to punishment in Kazakhstan

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1177/14624745261474474
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines public attitudes towards punishment in Kazakhstan through a Global East lens. Drawing on focus group data from settlements historically shaped by Soviet penal colonies, the study finds that punitiveness in Kazakhstan is structured by the memory and material legacy of Soviet convict-settler colonialism. In contrast to findings from the Global North and South, fear of crime and hostility towards ethnicised or racialised ‘others’ do not drive preferences for harsh punishment in the data. Instead, respondents primarily expressed a desire for offenders and penal institutions to fulfil economic functions that had been embedded in the Soviet penal philosophy of ‘internal colonisation’. Penal colonies were intended to build towns, develop local economies, and form the basis of identities in communities that were striving ultimately to bring about global revolution. Respondents’ preference for prison thus represented a desire for a return to this penal productivism. The article argues that these findings require expanding conventional definitions of punitiveness to account for the distinctive penal political economy of the Global East.