Nanoparticle Engineering in Modern Vaccinology: From Delivery Platforms to Immune-Programming Architectures

Molecules, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/molecules31142501
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Recent advances in vaccinology have accelerated the shift from conventional live-attenuated and inactivated vaccines toward subunit and nucleic acid-based platforms. Although these next-generation vaccines offer improved safety, rapid adaptability, and manufacturing flexibility, their relatively low intrinsic immunogenicity often requires efficient adjuvants and delivery systems. Nanoparticle-based vaccine platforms have therefore emerged as versatile tools capable of protecting antigens, improving targeted delivery, and modulating both innate and adaptive immune responses. This review summarizes the major classes of nanovaccine platforms, including lipid and polymeric nanoparticles, self-assembling protein nanostructures such as virus-like particles and ferritin nanocages, saponin-based self-assembling complexes, and inorganic nanomaterials. Particular attention is given to how vaccine performance is determined not only by material composition but also by nanoparticle physicochemical properties, biodistribution, cellular uptake, and mechanisms of immune activation. We further discuss the major challenges limiting clinical translation, including scalable manufacturing, safety evaluation, quality control, regulatory requirements, and long-term biocompatibility. Finally, emerging strategies involving hybrid and personalized nanovaccine platforms are highlighted, illustrating how nanotechnology and immunoengineering are transforming vaccine development for both prophylactic and therapeutic applications.