Improving Kazakh Abstractive Summarization with LLMs via Domain Adaptation and Self-Correction

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/info17070639
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have improved abstractive text summarization, yet their benefits remain limited for low-resource and morphologically rich languages such as Kazakh. This study investigates the adaptation of the instruction-tuned Gemma-3-4B-it (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) model for Kazakh news summarization. We propose a two-stage training pipeline combining domain-adaptive pretraining (DAPT) on an unlabeled Kazakh news corpus with parameter-efficient supervised fine-tuning (SFT) using LoRA on summarization datasets. We also examine an inference-time self-correction step in which the model revises its initial summaries to improve consistency and reduce factual errors. Experiments are conducted on Kazakh news data, including a translated version of XSum and corpora collected from BAQ and TengriNews. We compare the baseline, SFT-only, DAPT-only, and DAPT + SFT configurations, with and without self-correction. Evaluation is performed using ROUGE, BERTScore, chrF++, human assessment, and qualitative linguistic analysis. The results show that DAPT combined with SFT achieves the strongest overall performance, while self-correction further improves automatic scores in the DAPT + SFT setting. However, human evaluation indicates that metric gains do not always correspond to higher factual faithfulness or informativeness. These findings highlight the need for domain adaptation and careful evaluation when applying LLMs to Kazakh summarization.