Digital Well-Control Twin for Pressure-Window Management, Kick and Loss Risk Assessment, and Hybrid Bottom-Hole Pressure Prediction

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/app16125920
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Well control during drilling requires continuous assessment of bottom-hole pressure (BHP) relative to the pressure window bounded by formation and fracture pressures. This study presents a reduced-order, physics-guided digital-twin framework for well-control decision support, kick and loss risk assessment, and hybrid BHP prediction. The framework is intended as a computational decision-support prototype rather than a fully deployed, real-time, field-validated digital twin. It combines pressure-window calculations, dimensionless risk indices, bounded machine-learning correction, scenario-based event simulation, an interactive engineering dashboard, and 3D safety-envelope visualization. The machine-learning layer was trained on a predominantly augmented drilling dataset containing 909 cases, including nine field-related baseline records and 900 synthetically generated cases, and was used as a constrained correction mechanism rather than a replacement for the physics-based model. On the held-out test set, the BHP regression model achieved R2 = 0.987, MAE = 108.6 psi, and RMSE = 215.7 psi, while the well-control status classifier achieved an accuracy of 98.35%. Scenario simulations reproduced representative kick-prone and loss-prone conditions and tracked the evolution of BHP, the Pressure Safety Index, the Kick Risk Index, and the Loss Risk Index. The results show that the proposed workflow can identify underbalanced states, quantify pressure margins, evaluate mud-weight sensitivity, and support visual interpretation of well-control risk. Further field validation, real-time data integration, uncertainty quantification, and robustness testing are required before operational deployment.