Beyond Linear Risk: A U-Shaped Association Between Platelet Reactivity and Mortality in Coronary Artery Disease

Шолпан Болатовна Жангелова, Orazbek Sakhov, Lyazat Abisheva, Dmitriy Polyakov, Farida Rustamova, А.Б. Альмуханова, Galiya Umenova, Gulzada Nurgaliyeva, Aigyul Izhanova, Dana Akhmentayeva

2 more authors

D. A. Kapsultanova, Friba Nurmukhammad

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/diseases14060194
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal platelet inhibition is essential for minimizing both thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Although high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) has been consistently associated with adverse clinical outcomes, the relationship between platelet reactivity-measured as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU)-and cardiovascular mortality remains incompletely characterized. In particular, potential non-linear associations have not been adequately explored. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the association between PRU and cardiovascular mortality in patients with CAD, with a specific focus on identifying potential non-linear relationships. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study including 1000 patients with angiographically confirmed CAD treated at a tertiary cardiology center in Almaty, Kazakhstan, between 2024 and 2025. Platelet reactivity was assessed using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of cardiovascular mortality. To assess potential non-linear associations between PRU and mortality, restricted cubic spline regression was applied with predefined knot placement. Model performance was evaluated in terms of discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test). RESULTS: for non-linearity = X). Both low and high PRU values were associated with increased mortality, whereas intermediate PRU levels corresponded to the lowest observed risk. Additional independent predictors of mortality included advanced age, diabetes mellitus, and elevated inflammatory markers. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal a significant non-linear association between platelet reactivity and cardiovascular mortality in patients with CAD. Both insufficient and excessive platelet inhibition appear to confer increased risk, suggesting that optimal PRU targets may lie within an intermediate therapeutic range. These results support a paradigm shift toward more individualized antiplatelet therapy strategies guided by platelet function testing.