Integrated Biotechnological Strategies for Planetary Health and Ecosystem Restoration

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.2478/ebtj-2026-0009
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract The escalation of ecological degradation, marked by climatic instability, precipitous biodiversity loss, and systemic chemical infiltration, necessitates a shift toward integrated biotechnological intervention. This analysis considers how the trajectory of diverse advanced methodologies, including environmental DNA (eDNA) surveillance, CRISPR-based genetic restitution, and synthetic biology-driven bioremediation, might be synthesized into a unified Planetary Health Framework. By exploring the convergence of high-precision genomic engineering, AI-augmented bioinformatic modeling, and the tenets of a circular bio-economy, we examine the capacity of technological intervention to ameliorate ecological stressors and restore critical ecosystems. Moving beyond the constraints of conventional conservation, this discourse explores frontier solutions in climate-resilient agrotechnology, photo-driven biomanufacturing, and technologically integrated urban ecology, highlighting the criticality of microbiome modulation and comprehensive genomic repositories in stabilizing the biosphere. By reconciling molecular-level precision with macro-scale systems ecology, this framework points to a trajectory for sustainable development where technological scalability is constrained by, yet optimized for, planetary boundaries. Ultimately, this review addresses the imperatives of ethical oversight and highlights the multi-sectoral governance architectures required for the responsible global deployment of these “living technologies.”