Abstract
The proliferation of sensor networks in critical infrastructure, healthcare monitoring, and smart city applications demands robust privacy-preserving mechanisms for data verification. Zero-knowledge succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (zk-SNARKs) offer a promising cryptographic primitive that enables data integrity verification without revealing sensitive sensor readings. However, the practical feasibility of deploying zk-SNARKs in resource-constrained sensor network environments remains insufficiently characterized. This paper presents a systematic benchmarking study of the Groth16 zk-SNARK protocol across eight representative circuit types spanning six orders of magnitude in computational complexity, from basic arithmetic operations (1 constraint) to ECDSA signature verification (1,510,185 constraints). Using an automated open-source benchmarking framework built on the Circom-snarkjs toolchain, we conducted 160 statistically controlled measurements (20 iterations per circuit) with cold/warm separation, collecting proof generation time, verification time, proof size, memory consumption, and witness generation overhead. Our results demonstrate that Groth16 proofs maintain a constant size of 804.7±1.7 bytes and near-constant verification time of 0.662±0.032 s regardless of circuit complexity, with coefficients of variation below 5% across all circuit types. Proof generation time exhibits sub-linear scaling (α=0.256, R2=0.608), with statistically significant differences between circuit categories confirmed by one-way ANOVA (F=355.0, p<10-79, η2=0.94). We identify three operational deployment tiers for sensor network architectures and estimate energy budgets for battery-powered devices. These findings provide actionable guidance for the design of privacy-preserving data verification systems in next-generation sensor networks.