Comparison of untargeted metabolomic patterns between Italian Landrace and Italian Large White pigs reveals distinct molecular phenotypes

Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/1828051x.2026.2624165
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Breed characteristics are shaped by complex biological mechanisms which, when dissected at the molecular level, can lead to the identification of novel phenotypes useful for the development of phenomics-guided breeding strategies. Building on this, we investigated differences at the metabolome level between the two main maternal lines used in Italian heavy pig crossbreeding schemes: Italian Landrace (ILA) and Italian Large White (ILW), given their relevance in the production of protected designation of origin (PDO) products. We conducted untargeted plasma metabolomics on 205 pigs (53 ILA and 152 ILW), generating high-quality profiles of 576 metabolites. Differentially abundant metabolites were identified using Boruta, a random forest-based feature selection algorithm integrated into a computational pipeline designed to reduce stochastic variability. We also leveraged the unbalanced breed sample sizes to evaluate the influence of population composition and sampling design on metabolite selection. Specifically, ILW animals were either downsampled into three balanced but distinct subsets or included in unbalanced datasets of increasing size. Across all analyses, 59 metabolites differentiated the two breeds. Approximately, 30% were repeatedly identified across all three balanced subsets, and 60–70% appeared in at least two. Inclusion of larger, unbalanced datasets increased the number of selected metabolites by ∼25%, indicating improved sensitivity with larger sample sizes while balanced designs enhanced robustness. Biologically, ILW pigs showed elevated gamma-glutamyl amino acids, indicating enhanced glutathione-cycle activity, while ILA pigs exhibited higher hexosylceramides, consistent with greater fat deposition. These findings highlight breed-specific metabolic architectures and support the application of metabolomics in precision breeding for PDO-oriented systems.