Subjective well-being and objective living conditions: a dual approach to measuring sustainability in cities

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1057/s41599-026-06902-z
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract This study addresses the gap between formal statistical indicators of development and residents’ perceptions of quality of life amid socio-economic transformation. The aim is to analyze discrepancies between objective living conditions and subjective well-being in two contrasting urban contexts. A dual approach was applied, combining the calculation of the Sustainable Urban Development Index (SUDI) based on 27 statistical indicators for 2022 and the analysis of data from a stratified sociological survey ( N = 200) conducted in July-August 2024 in the capital city of Astana and the regional center of Kyzylorda. Data processing was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23. The analysis reveals a structural imbalance. Astana demonstrates a higher overall SUDI score (0.634) and strong infrastructure but reports lower subjective ratings in several domains, reflecting higher expectations. Kyzylorda, despite a moderate index value (0.527) and pronounced environmental challenges (0.287), exhibits a “satisfaction paradox,” whereby deficits in material conditions are partly offset by social capital. The findings confirm that improvements in quantitative indicators do not automatically lead to higher subjective well-being. The novelty of the study lies in demonstrating the compensatory role of social ties in resource-constrained urban contexts and in highlighting the value of integrating objective indicators and subjective assessments in urban sustainability analysis.