Framing Bloody January: a comparative analysis of state and independent media narratives in Kazakhstan

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/02634937.2025.2611918
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study draws on framing theory and agenda-setting theory to examine how both state-owned and independent media outlets in Kazakhstan presented the Bloody January event in 2022. In particular, the study seeks to answer the question: ‘How did Kazakhstan’s state and independent media frame the key flashpoints of Bloody January, and what narratives did they promote?’ To address this, the paper employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative content analysis of four prominent media outlets. The state-owned sources include Qazaqstan TV (Kaztelradio Corporation) and the Kazakh-language newspaper Egemen Qazaqstan, while the independent outlets analysed are Azattyq.org and Channel 31. Findings show that state media produced nearly twice as much content as independent media during the crisis, contributing to the dominance of official narratives. While state outlets framed protestors as threats to public order, independent media offered more diverse accounts, highlighting issues such as state violence and the government’s use of force.