SUSTAINABILITY OF THE COMPULSORY HEALTH INSURANCE SYSTEM IN KAZAKHSTAN: ANALYSIS OF POPULATION COVERAGE AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47316/cajmhe.2025.6.4.07
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The compulsory social health insurance system introduced in Kazakhstan in 2020 plays a central role in ensuring the financial sustainability and accessibility of healthcare. Upcoming reforms, including the implementation of the Unified Package of Health Services in 2025–2027, require stable population coverage. However, recent data indicate declining enrollment, raising concerns about equity, financial protection, and the system’s long-term viability. The objective of this study was to assess population coverage dynamics under the compulsory social health insurance system from 2020 to 2025, identify regional differences, and evaluate implications for forthcoming healthcare financing reforms. A retrospective analysis of national and regional coverage indicators was conducted using descriptive statistics, absolute and relative change calculations, and annual growth rates. Interregional variability was assessed through dispersion measures, with comparative analysis between regions and cities of national significance. National coverage declined from 84.6% in 2020 to 81.9% in 2025, demonstrating a fluctuating but overall downward trajectory. All regions reported declines of -2 to -11 percentage points, with the sharpest decreases in Akmola Oblast and Shymkent. Persistent regional heterogeneity was observed, with gaps exceeding 12 percentage points. Urban centers consistently demonstrated lower coverage than regions. The study revealed a persistent downward trend in compulsory social health insurance coverage, significant regional disparities, and increasing interregional variability, which may call into question the effectiveness of the future Unified Package of Health Services. Strengthening mechanisms will be crucial to ensuring the sustainability and equity of Kazakhstan's compulsory social health insurance system.