A comparative analysis of reintegration of foreign Ph.D. degree holders to research environments in Kazakhstan, Malaysia and Cambodia

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/03057925.2025.2587647
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study on the reintegration experiences of internationally educated doctoral degree holders returning to their home countries. Using Structuration Theory, it explores how returnees are shaped by, yet also shape, their research environments. Data were collected via qualitative semi-structured interviews in Kazakhstan, Cambodia, and Malaysia. Findings reveal common challenges and strategies, as well as unique reintegration issues and opportunities across the three contexts. A key insight is that the experiences of returning scholars are significantly influenced by neo-colonial structures in academia, which affect the scholars’ ability to adapt to and transform their research environments.