AI-Powered Libraries: Comparative Insights for an Adaptive Repository

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2025ec4/1190
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper examines how academic staff access and use e-books, and what features they expect from a future digital library platform. Based on survey results, the study reveals that most respondents rely on informal sources, while official databases are used less frequently. At the same time, there is strong demand for key functionalities such as access to a wide collection of e-books, quiz generation, personalized recommendations, and tools for tracking student performance. In addition, the paper provides a comparative review of existing platforms—Perlego, QuizBot, Bookmate, Khan Academy, and Scopus—highlighting both their strengths and limitations, particularly with respect to language support and integration. Taken together, the survey findings and platform analysis underscore the need for a unified adaptive platform that connects publishers, libraries, and users, thereby enhancing accessibility, interoperability, and effectiveness in digital learning.