Smart Prediction of Emissions in City Based on Meteo Factors Using XGBoost and LSTM

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/e-tems64751.2025.11239300
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study explores the use of three machine learning models—Linear Regression, XGBoost, and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to predict air pollutant concentrations based on meteorological factors in Almaty, Kazakhstan, from 2021 to 2024. The primary aim is to assess how well these models can capture the relationships between environmental variables such as temperature, humidity, and wind speed, and air quality metrics including PM2.5, PM10 and CO. Linear Regression was used as an initial approach to model linear dependencies, while XGBoost was employed to capture more complex, non-linear relationships, and LSTM was utilized to model temporal dynamics in the data. Performance was evaluated using Mean Square Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and R-squared (R2) values, with XGBoost showing the best overall performance, particularly for PM2.5, with an R2 of 0.803. LSTM demonstrated strong predictive power for time-series data but had slightly lower R values compared to XGBoost. The study concludes that while XGBoost outperforms Linear Regression and LSTM in terms of explaining variance in air quality, all models have certain limitations, including data quality issues and a limited dataset. Further research with more comprehensive datasets could enhance the predictive capabilities and generalizability of these models for air quality forecasting.