Federated Machine Learning for Monitoring Student Mental Health in Kazakhstan

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.14569/ijacsa.2025.0161022
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving and decentralized paradigm for machine learning, making it particularly suitable for analyzing sensitive psychological and physiological data. This study aims to develop and evaluate a federated learning framework for assessing the psycho-emotional well-being of students in Kazakhstani educational institutions, where data privacy and infrastructural constraints pose significant challenges. We benchmark three FL algorithms, such as FedAvg, FedOpt, and FedProx, on heterogeneous, institution-level datasets that combine sleep, dietary, activity, and self-reported emotional measures. Experiments simulate cross-device, non-IID deployments and evaluate convergence, accuracy, and stability across ten communication rounds. Results show that FedProx attains the best trade-off between accuracy and stability under non-IID conditions (peak accuracy is 99.9%), while FedOpt provides faster early convergence, and FedAvg performs well for more homogeneous partitions. The methodological contribution comprises optimized aggregation and adaptive client weighting to mitigate non-IID effects in resource-constrained educational settings. These findings validate FL as a scalable, privacy-preserving approach for mental health monitoring in education and support its use for early intervention and resilience tracking. The proposed framework contributes to data-driven mental health policy design in educational systems, addressing both ethical and infrastructural considerations. The study discusses limitations of the simulated setup and outlines directions for broader deployment and cross-silo validation.