Applying LLMs like ChatGPT, Deepseek, Grok for student work evaluation

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.54596/10.54596/2958-0048-2025-2-220-230
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article discusses the possibilities of using large language models (LM), such as ChatGPT, Deep Seek and Grok, in the tasks of evaluating student papers. The author conducts a qualitative analysis of the results obtained using ChatGPT, in comparison with teaching assessments, with an emphasis on identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the automated approach. The potential advantages of using LLM are discussed – processing speed, compliance with criteria, scalability – as well as limitations associated with evaluating creativity and depth of analysis. Special attention is paid to the applicability of various models depending on the type of assignment (text, code) and the specifics of the discipline. The work is of a review and analytical nature and can serve as a starting point for further research in the field of digitalization of educational assessment and integration of LLM into the educational process.