Structural Barriers and Opportunities for Financial Inclusion of Women in Kazakhstan

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47703/ejebs.v69i2.492
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Despite steady growth in banking resources in Kazakhstan, female engagement in credit markets remains uneven and constrained by structural imbalances. The current study aims to assess the impact of structural features of the banking sector in Kazakhstan on financial accessibility and women's involvement in credit relations. To measure structural accessibility, a composite indicator was developed using two groups of variables: resource-based indicators (interbank deposits, loans received, and customer deposits) and concentration indicators (top-5 banks’ share of assets, loan portfolios, and customer deposits). The statistical materials on the regulation and development of the financial market and the National Bank of Kazakhstan and Bureau of National Statistics for 2013-2023 were used as initial data. The study results show that credit availability for women has not increased proportionally despite the steady growth of banking resources. The theoretical availability index decreased to 0.487 in 2023 due to the high concentration of the banking sector, and correlation analysis confirmed the absence of a statistically significant relationship between structural opportunities and the actual volume of women's loans. Periods with strong resource growth and moderate theoretical accessibility, such as 2018, coincided with peak credit issuance to women despite high sectoral concentration. These findings highlight the need to account for institutional, behavioral, and policy-driven factors when evaluating financial inclusion outcomes. Further research should focus on a detailed analysis of the impact of government programs and initiatives and the study of behavioral and institutional factors limiting women's financial activity.