Mutual influence of morality and religion

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2025hph1/390-398
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article was written in the scope of the topic of the dissertation research “The problem of relationship of morality and religion in Kazakh philosophy”. The article examines the intricate relationship between morality and religion, exploring their historical, philosophical, and cultural intersections. It highlights the evolution of moral norms as both independent of and intertwined with religious ideologies. These secular approaches fre-quently prioritize practical outcomes, emphasizing efficiency and overall benefits. However, individualistic and utilitarian perspectives can sometimes conflict with deeper, more intrinsic moral values associated with religion. As a result, whereas secular morality can foster social cohesion and progress, it does not always align with deeper moral principles that surpass purely practical considerations. This perspective suggests that morality is a product of social and historical evolution rather than being dictated by practical reasons. Alt-hough moral standards have traditionally been tied to religious consciousness, their modern humanistic rein-terpretation places greater emphasis on their genetical connection with sources and process of emancipation of moral norms from religion, becoming secular morality as independent construction. The article ultimately discusses the question of the dependance and contextual nature of religion on morality and at the same time autonomous nature of moral obligations, underscoring the importance of situational ethics and human deci-sion-making over rigid absolutes. In conclusion, it advocates viewing morality as an autonomous form of so-cial awareness, fully capable of guiding humanity independent of religious influence.