Abstract
Dear Editor, We read the published Banzai et al.’s article doi. 10.4103/gmit.gmit_11_22, with great interest. Banzai et al.[1] reported in their article that the ectopic pregnancy implanted in the fallopian tube’s interstitial segment is defined as cornual pregnancy (CP). The published Banzai et al.’s[1] article may be confusing to the readers. “Cornual pregnancy (CP)” defines the pregnancy implanted in the rudimentary horn of a uterus with Müllerian anomaly.[2-5] “Interstitial pregnancy (IP)” defines the pregnancy implanted in the fallopian tube’s interstitial segment.[6-8] Moreover, Banzai et al.,[1]Figure 1 is a figure of ruptured IP and not a figure of ruptured CP because the uterus in Figure 1 does not contain rudimentary horn or Müllerian anomaly.[9,10]Figure 1: A figure of ruptured interstitial pregnancy and not a figure of ruptured cornual pregnancy.[ 1 ] Reproduced from Banzai C et al., Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2023, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)CONCLUSION IP defines the pregnancy implanted in the fallopian tube’s interstitial segment. CP defines the pregnancy implanted in the rudimentary horn of a uterus with Müllerian anomaly. Author contributions IAA, AD, and AA designed this letter to editor, reviewed the literature, updated the references, and revised this letter to editor before submission for publication. Data availability statement Not applicable as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current article. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.