Didactic Conditions for the Organization of Self-Study and Self-Assessment of Students in the Study of Biology

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1177/10567879241238367
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to develop approaches, in which students are motivated for self-study and self-assessment with minimal teacher guidance. Schools were selected randomly for the study. Each of them had 4 cohorts per course. In such a cohort, three experimental groups and one control group were randomly selected. One experimental group was given both success criteria and a checklist, another experimental group was given success criteria, and a third experimental group was given a checklist. As a result of the research, it can be seen that the method of teaching the material, as well as the means, affect the success criteria. The use of different methods of self-assessment in the learning process increases the knowledge and motivation of students to study biology. The findings will help teachers and other educators meet the educational challenges of the twenty-first century.