Economic inequality in Kazakhstan: analysis and evaluation

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52821/2789-4401-2024-6-141-151
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Purpose of the research – the purpose of the study is to analyze and assess economic inequality in Kazakhstan by determining the prerequisites for its occurrence. Methodology – In the course of the study of economic inequality in the regions of Kazakhstan, the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: methods of analysis and synthesis, methods of comparison and generalization, methods of statistical analysis and coefficient analysis. Originality / value – the study is devoted to the analysis of the problems of economic inequality in Kazakhstan in terms of income of the population and regions. The authors conducted a literary review, analyzed statistical data, compared indicators with foreign countries, presented data on the assessment of inequality in the regions of Kazakhstan according to the criteria: quality of life, material conditions and well-being. At the same time, information on the problems of economic inequality and the development of recommendations for its reduction has been systematized and structured. Findings – the results of the study. According to the results of the study, the authors identified problematic aspects that generate economic inequality among the regions, identified their positions, and formed recommendations to reduce economic inequality.