Protein Identification Improvement in Complex Samples Using Higher Frequency MS Acquisition and PEAKS Software

Applied Sciences, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/app15020666
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Protein identification in complex biological samples using the shotgun mode of LC-MS/MS is typically enhanced by employing longer LC columns and extended gradient times. However, improved identification rates can also be achieved by optimizing MS acquisition frequencies and employing advanced software, without increasing analysis time, thus maintaining the throughput of the method. To date, we found only one study in the literature examining the influence of MS acquisition frequency on protein identification, specifically using two ion trap mass spectrometer models. This study aims to address the gap by analyzing the impact of MS acquisition tuning of the QTOF instrument on the analysis of complex samples. Our findings indicate that increasing acquisition frequency generally improves protein identification, although the extent of improvement depends on the sample type. For CHO cell lysates, protein identifications increased by over 10%, while E. coli and albumin-depleted plasma samples demonstrated gains of 3.6% and 2.6%, respectively. Higher contributions to protein identification were also achieved with extended LC gradients, resulting in improvements of 21.6% for CHO, 18.2% for E. coli, and 10.3% for plasma. Moreover, enabling PEAKS’ deep learning feature significantly boosted identifications, with increases of 22.9% for CHO, 23.2% for E. coli, and 9.2% for plasma.