A Comprehensive Analysis of Modern Generative Models for Echocardiography Image Synthesis

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/icamac62387.2024.10828708
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The use of machine learning (ML) in the medical field is hindered by the scarcity of high-quality data. This work tackles the deficiency of echocardiogram pictures (echoCG) by using advanced generative models for synthetic creation. We provide a comprehensive practical assessment of these approaches and ascertain their limits. Our study examines the efficacy of a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (CycleGAN), a contrastive unpaired translation (CUT) approach, and a latent diffusion model (Stable Diffusion 1.5). We outline our data generating approach, exhibit picture examples, describe our assessment strategy, and offer findings from a user study measuring the perceived quality and medical validity of the produced samples, done with licensed cardiologists and surgeons.