The concept of a smart contract: advantages and current situation of legal regulation in the Republic of Kazakhstan

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2024l3/100-112
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This scientific article outlines the current provisions of the legal regulation of smart contracts, the relevance of which will grow as such contracts spread in various spheres and areas of life. Thus, the main problem of regulating relations on the use of a smart contract is the ambiguity of its legal essence, the lack of regulation in legislation, including in the Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. At the same time, some advantages of a smart contract are clearly shown by examples, which will help facilitate the process of concluding, changing, terminating and executing contracts. The main advantages of a smart contract are also discussed in detail, such as automation, transparency, security, efficiency, low intermediary costs, decentralization, flexibility and programmability. In the research, the authors touched upon the problems of fulfilling obligations in debt relations, the potential advantages and assistance of a smart contract in enforcement proceedings. The result of the exploration is a formulated definition of a smart contract and the identification of specific potential advantages of this type of non-traditional contracts. The authors summarize the results, noting the absence of a legal definition of a smart contract in the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the exclusively declarative nature of its legal regulation; the ambiguity of the range of public relations where contracts in this form are applicable, which does not allow the widespread dissemination and use of a smart contract.