Abstract
The actuality of the scientific research is determined by the need of finding the most effective way of resolving corporate disputes, which are caused by the creation of new social relations in the sphere of management in a post-soviet environment. The research aims to analyze mediation procedures as a way of resolving corporate disputes with the account of Kazakhstan Republic's national legislation peculiarities. Amongst used approaches, the dogmatic method, synthesis method, juristic hermeneutics method, logical analysis method, theoretical approach, induction method, and others were used in the research. Comparative-juristic analysis was conducted in the research, which allowed us to investigate the modern state of corporate dispute prevention and resolution mechanisms in the context of juristic practices of European Union countries and Kazakhstan. Analysis of this segment has shown that the current mediation practice of resolving corporate disputes has several drawbacks and problems, which causes a need of implementing international practice into the law enforcement practice of Kazakhstan while addressing all the peculiarities of current national legislation. An analysis of the corporate dispute resolution mechanism was conducted, which allowed highlighting key characteristics, attributes, and functioning principles of the segment. During the current national basis analysis, the adoption of the Law "On mediation" caused several amendments in the legislative acts. Even though, norm regulation still has problematic aspects. The practicality of acquired results is in the ways of fixing issues with corporate dispute resolution via mediation mechanism functioning.