Is transvaginal ultrasound an appropriate screening tool for endometrial cancer in asymptomatic postmenopausal women? A case report

Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 2020

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1085_19
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

A 55-years-old woman menopausal for the last 6 years discovered to have an endometrial thickness (ET) > 12 mm (suspected endometrial polyp) during routine evaluation in the gynaecology clinic using the transvaginal ultrasound (TVS). Departmental ultrasound confirmed the same TVS findings and suggested the presence of endometrial polyp as the main cause of the ET. Based upon the patient's risk factors (diabetic, hypertensive, obese with family history of endometrial cancer), a departmental decision was taken to proceed for diagnostic hysteroscopy and polypectomy after informed written consent. Large endometrial polyp and submucosal fibroid were found and excised during hysteroscopy. The histopathological results confirmed the intraoperative diagnosis of the endometrial polyp and submucosal fibroid. This report supports the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommendations and highlights that the TVS is not an appropriate screening tool for asymptomatic postmenopausal women. In addition, the ET > 4 mm in asymptomatic postmenopausal women does not need evaluation.