Do Identical Twins Write Identically? Evidence from Authorship Attribution

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/09296174.2025.2568210
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study investigates the writing styles of identical twins to determine if their shared genetics result in identical writing. We used computational authorship analysis techniques on writing samples from three sets of identical twins, focusing on lexical, grammatical, and syntactic features. Our results show that machine learning can effectively distinguish between the writing styles of identical twins, primarily using function words, part of speech tags or dependency relations as features. We also found that twins’ writing styles are not necessarily more similar to each other than to unrelated individuals. While the sample is too small to make generalizable conclusions, these findings potentially highlight the complex interplay of genetics and environment in shaping writing style, with implications for authorship attribution, forensic linguistics, and our understanding of human individuality.