Effect of Data Balancing Methods on MRI Alzheimer’s Classification

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/sist61657.2025.11139255
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease classification using MRI scans is challenging due to class imbalance in medical imaging. This study examines the effects of data augmentation, weight balancing, and synthetic image generation on classification accuracy. Six deep learning models—EfficientNetB4, ResNet152, VGG19, Xception, InceptionV3, and DenseNet121—were tested under three conditions: (1) no augmentation, (2) traditional augmentation, and (3) synthetic image augmentation. Models trained on imbalanced data performed poorly, while weight balancing and synthetic data improved accuracy and robustness. The best performance (97%) was achieved with EfficientNetB4 and Xception using synthetic images, highlighting synthetic data as a promising solution for class imbalance in MRI-based Alzheimer's classification.