Assessing the effectiveness and potential of modular education in higher learning institutions

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.18844/cerj.v15i2.9698
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The global health crisis in early 2020 disrupted conventional teaching methods, prompting a rapid shift toward alternative instructional models. This study investigates the effectiveness of the modular learning approach introduced during the pandemic and seeks to identify an optimal methodological framework for its implementation in higher education. The research employed theoretical and comparative analysis, observation, survey methods, and didactic design to explore how modular learning influenced student training quality. Findings indicate that the modular approach contributed positively to the organization and delivery of academic content, supporting student engagement and learning continuity during a period of crisis. Furthermore, the study highlights critical elements for structuring this methodology effectively, emphasizing the importance of flexibility, autonomy, and coherence in learning design. These insights offer practical value for university educators and education planners aiming to refine instructional strategies in both emergency and long-term contexts. Keywords: Active learning; higher education; instructional design; modular teaching; pandemic pedagogy