Almaty ankle exoskeleton: comparative analysis and structural improvements of versions V.1 and V.2

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.21595/vp.2025.24972
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the V.1 and V.2 versions of the Almaty Ankle Exoskeleton. The main objective of the study is to identify the structural and functional shortcomings observed in the first version (V.1) and to develop an improved prototype in the second version (V.2) by addressing these issues. The paper compares the kinematic schemes, CAD models, and physical prototypes of both versions, highlighting their structural differences and technical advancements. In addition, the results of a static structural analysis performed on the V.2 prototype using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method are presented. This analysis allowed for the evaluation of stress, strain, and displacement distribution within the structure. The results demonstrated that the exoskeleton can effectively handle applied loads, although additional reinforcement is required in certain critical regions. Overall, the findings provide a foundation for engineering solutions aimed at enhancing the functional performance of the ankle exoskeleton and its application in rehabilitation processes.