Decision-Making in Suicidal Behavior: The Protective Role of Loss Aversion

Gergö Hadlaczky, Sebastian Hökby, Anahit Mkrtchian, Danuta Wasserman, Judit Balázs, Núria Machín, Marco Sarchiapone, Merike Sisask, Vladimir Carli

Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2018

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00116
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background: Loss aversion is a central and well operationalized trait behavior that describes the tendency for humans to strongly prefer avoiding losses to making equivalent gains. Human decision-making is thus biased towards safer choices. Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between loss aversion and suicidal behavior in a large cohort of adolescents recruited in 30 schools of seven European countries for a longitudinal study (Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN65120704). We hypothesized that individuals with higher loss aversion would be less likely to attempt suicide. Methods: A mixed monetary gamble task was used to generate loss aversion scores for each participant. Logistic regression was used to estimate the cross-sectional association between loss aversion and life-time suicide attempts in the baseline sample (N = 2158; 156 attempters), and incident attempts were predicted in a four-month prospective model (N = 1763; 75 attempters). Multiple regression was used to estimate the association between loss aversion and suicidal ideation. Results: Loss aversion was a significant predictor of attempted suicide in both the cross-sectional (OR = .79; P = .005) and prospective analysis (OR = .81; P = .040), adjusting for depression, anxiety, stress, and sex. The correlation between pre and post measures of loss aversion was r = .52 (P < .001). Interestingly, although depression, anxiety and stress was associated with suicidal ideation, loss aversion was not (cross-sectional model: P = .092; Prospective model: P = .390). This suggests the concept of loss aversion may be useful in understanding the transition from suicidal thoughts to attempts. Conclusions: This and previous studies suggest that altered decision-making is involved in suicide attempts. In our study we show the involvement of loss aversion in particular, and propose that individuals high in loss aversion are discouraged from carrying out the suicide attempt because of a greater focus on the negative consequences of the decision.