Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in treating grade I–II gonarthrosis: a scientific review

2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.36425/rehab630518
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This review article explores the use of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in treating grades I–II gonarthrosis (knee osteoarthritis). The authors conduct a comprehensive analysis of existing studies and compare extracorporeal shock wave therapy with conventional treatment methods such as placebo, corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, and pharmacological treatments. Key findings from the review indicate a significant improvement in pain reduction and enhanced functional state of the knee joint in patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave therapy compared to other methods. The authors emphasize the non-invasiveness and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy, noting the absence of serious side effects, which makes this therapy a preferred option for clinical use. The article stands out due to its thorough analysis of available literature and a focus on the comparative effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy, providing a basis for medical recommendations. Additionally, the authors highlight the need for further research to refine optimal application parameters for extracorporeal shock wave therapy and to confirm its long-term effectiveness, particularly in comparison with other modern treatment methods for gonarthrosis. This approach underscores the uniqueness of this review, which not only informs about the current state of research in the field of gonarthrosis treatment but also stimulates further scientific developments in this direction, supporting clinical practice with evidence-based methods.