Factors Affecting Indoor Temperature in the Case of District Heating

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/su152115603
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In this study, the influence of variables defining indoor temperature is studied, focusing on operational data and visual and technical inspections rather than the temperature control setpoints and occupancy schedule. This is incorrect because infiltration and insolation are highly variable. This results in lowering the temperature difference between the supply and return lines, overheating some spaces, lowering the indoor temperature in others, and poor hydronic balancing. The novelty lies in studying the actual operating condition of real district heating (DH) systems. The research hypothesis is that internal heat gains along with the infiltration of and variations in outdoor temperature cause daily changes in indoor temperature. These factors seem to be the primary reasons for the variations in supply and return temperature, if the rate of energy loss is not large in new office buildings constructed according to tightened contemporary energy conservation regulations. The saving effect is achieved by allowing the energy to be dumped into building envelopes; thus, the flow rate or supply temperature are varied in a narrower range. Dumping heat by using the storage capacity of building envelopes is suggested. The corrected design approach minimizes energy consumption and increases annual performance (e.g., by 14.1% here). Advantages are achieved by tuning a controller at a DH substation.