Макроструктурный анализ повествовательных текстов тюркоязычных школьников-билингвов

2022

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.37892/2500-2902-2022-46-3-7-20
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The present study is devoted to the analysis of the macrostructure of oral narrative texts of Turkic-speaking bilingual schoolchildren. The research material was obtained using a MAIN — Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives — a tool for assessing the narrative abilities of bilinguals. Subjects for the analysis represent the most common language groups among children in Kazakhstan. The results of the study differ significantly from previous findings regarding the ratio of qualitative and quantitative indicators of the macrostructural complexity of bilingual stories in two languages, as well as in the comparative description of the features of closely related languages, their connections, similarities and differences in the conditions of bilingualism and multilingualism. Observations show that narrative competence develops depending on the subject’s age and propensity for storytelling and becomes fully structured only in the adulthood. Children begin to create narratives at about two years old, and from that moment their narrative competence develops intensively, although at different rates speed. A closer look at the various macrostructural components showed that the production was strikingly similar in the three language groups, both for frequently used and rarely encountered components of the macrostructure. The complexity of the plot was also considered from the other side — by estimating the number of episodes in which participants implemented complete GАО sequences. In all three language groups, on both L1 and L2, most speakers used at least one complete sequence. Nevertheless, it becomes clear that when conducting scientific research on bilingualism in the republic, it is necessary to take into account the regional socio-economic, demographic and ethno-linguistic conditions that have historically developed on the vast territory of the country.