Greedy Texts Similarity Mapping

Computation, 2022

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/computation10110200
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The documents similarity metric is a substantial tool applied in areas such as determining topic in relation to documents, plagiarism detection, or problems necessary to capture the semantic, syntactic, or structural similarity of texts. Evaluated results of the similarity measure depend on the types of word represented and the problem statement and can be time-consuming. In this paper, we present a problem-independent algorithm of the similarity metric greedy texts similarity mapping (GTSM), which is computationally efficient to be applied for large datasets with any preferred word vectorization models. GTSM maps words in two texts based on a decision rule that evaluates word similarity and their importance to the texts. We compare it with the well-known word mover’s distance (WMD) algorithm in the k-nearest neighbors text classification problem and find that it leads to similar or better results. In the correlation evaluation task of similarity measures with human-judged scores, we demonstrate its higher correlation scores in comparison with WMD and sentence mover’s similarity (SMS) and show that GTSM is a decent alternative for both word-level and sentence-level tasks.