Critical Systemic Properties of Electronic Atlases New Generation. Part 2: Research Results

V. Chabaniuk, I. Kolimasov

Data confidence 70 medium

How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Introduction.Part 2 discusses three critical systemic properties (CSP) of Electronic atlases (EA) new generation.With their help are determined fundamentally new, systemic EA.Compared with classic systems, new EA have much more opportunities to model spatial systems of actuality.The purpose of the paper is to describe and to prove the criticality of three CSP for a new generation of EA -systemic EA.Results.Three CSP are described: CSP1.System, CSP2.Tree, CSP3.View.CSP1.System means that systemic EA should be models of spatial systems of actuality.These models are primary in contrast to the classic EA models, which are secondary.CSP2.Tree means that the contents/solutions tree of the systemic EA must classify the modeled spatial system of actuality.CSP3.View should model the visualization needs of users, in particular through interactivity.The methods of Conceptual Frameworks and Solutions Frameworks of Relational cartography, as well as facts from Model-Based Engineering were used for proof.Conclusions.Three CSP of systemic EAs are described and it is proved that each of them is a necessary property of EA new generation.