Exploring university students’ misconceptions of the kinetic molecular theory of gases: A study from Kazakhstan

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.29333/ejmste/15957
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study investigates university students’ conceptual understanding and misconceptions about the kinetic molecular theory of gases (KMTG) in Kazakhstan. A sample of 223 students from two universities was assessed using the KMTG concept inventory. The sample consisted of 54.3% females and 45.7% males, with participants primarily in their first year of study (64.1%) and aged 17-18 (79.8%). The findings reveal significant misconceptions of molecular motion, gas pressure, entropy, and temperature changes in thermodynamic systems. For instance, 81.2% of students demonstrated incorrect conceptions about entropy, while 80.3% misunderstood temperature behavior during adiabatic processes. Statistically significant differences were observed in performance based on university affiliation and grade level, with Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University students and first-year students outperforming second-year students. However, no significant gender-based differences were identified. This research points out the persistence of misconceptions in molecular and thermodynamic physics, indicating the need for localized and interactive instructional strategies. These findings contribute to the growing body of literature on physics education in Central Asia, providing recommendations for curriculum development and teacher training in the region.