Cavitation erosion behaviour of MAB-CU4 alloy: influences of cavitation number, attack angle, time, and stand-off distance

Materials Research Express, 2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1088/2053-1591/ad8d34
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract The present study comprehensively examines the cavitation erosion behaviour of a manganese aluminium bronze alloy (MAB-CU4 alloy) as a function of several parameters (i.e., cavitation angle, cavitation number, time, and stand-off distance), particularly focusing on the influences of cavitation angle on the surface morphology and topography of the alloy. According to the design of experiment (Taguchi experimental design) analysis, mass loss increased with cavitation number and attack angle, while increasing the stand-off distance resulted in a decrease in mass loss and an increase in the surface area affected by cavitation erosion. Cavitation erosion behaviour was most affected by the cavitation attack angle, with the cavitation attack angle contributing 69.1% to total erosion, according to variance analysis. At 90° cavitation attack angle, MAB-CU4’s erosion rate was 64% greater than that at 30°. Scanning electron microscopy and optical profilometry revealed that cavitation erosion damage at 90° occurred mostly in the grain interiors as cavitation pits due to severe plastic deformation and surface corrosion, whereas pit formation was restricted around the hard secondary phases at the grain boundaries. At 30°, deep cavitation pits were limited, the erosion crater expanded, and the number of pits was reduced. Overall, finer microstructures with more grain boundaries and secondary phases may improve cavitation erosion resistance at 90°. The present study is the first to comprehensively capture erosion damage at the microstructural scale and analyse the impact of microstructural features on the erosion damage during the cavitation erosion of MAB-CU4 alloy.