Investigation into the Rock Mass Response to Pillar Extraction in a Hard Rock Tabular Mine

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.56952/arma-2024-1011
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Historically, secondary pillar extraction has been successful in the soft rock mining environment. Several hard rock platinum mines have conducted selective remnant extraction with backfill as a regional support measure. A hard rock tabular platinum mine instigated the extraction within a non-yield pillar layout without backfill support. The mine is situated within the Great Dyke of Zimbabwe in a shallow depth environment of approximately 100m. Pillar extraction without backfill in a hard rock mine is a novel mining method. A study was carried out to make a quantitative comparison between the various design parameters and the rock mass response measurements. The primary mining utilised the mechanised room and pillar mining method to extract ore from the wide tabular reef. Similar, low profile mechanised equipment with additional automated systems were adopted for ore extraction and transportation to the surface crusher. The risks associated with the extraction of pillars include large localised falls of ground due to wide spans, pillar run, high severity injuries due to windblasts and large regional collapses through to the surface. The pre-feasibility study for the mine layout design used MAP3D to assess the expected displacement and stress limits post-extraction. MAP3D uses the boundary element method of analysis and has an in-built CAD system for stress analysis and 3-dimensional visualisation of models. A monitoring strategy consisting of displacement, deformation, stress change, ground motion and groundwater level measurements was put in place to record the variations resulting from the pillar extraction. The rock mass response analysis aimed at trending the monitoring results, conducting a comparison to the design parameters and previous pillar collapse trends. Minor stress, strain, and displacement changes have been recorded within a period of one year since the project began with no visible deformation noted on accessible pillars. The current system was identified as including the hazard identification and first-pass monitoring stages. Real-time monitoring systems with a higher sensitivity are required to ensure long-term data retrieval and timeous emergency response.