Design of Conical Foundations with Increased Bearing Capacity in Areas of Undermined Soils

Applied Sciences, 2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/app14051816
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article discusses the foundations of a conical shape directed with their apex downwards to increase the cross-sectional area and, accordingly, the bearing capacity during settlement and under the influence of horizontal tensile strains in undermined areas. To simulate the deformability of undermined and seismically exposed foundations, a three-dimensional expandable box was manufactured and assembled. Models of a conical foundation with an aperture angle of the cones at 90° and 80° were buried into the soil at 0.75 of its height, in order to provide a safety margin for further loading due to an increase in the bearing area when the cone is immersed deeper into the ground. Laboratory and field tests were performed on the vertical loading of single cones before and after horizontal soil displacement. Numerical modeling of the interaction between soil and foundation was carried out for conical foundation models that were considered for laboratory and field testing using the Plaxis 2D (Version 8.2) program. To compare the bearing capacity, isolated shallow foundations with a diameter equal to the cross section of the conical foundation at the intersection with the ground surface were tested. The isolated shallow foundations lost their bearing capacity after 0.15 kN in laboratory tests and after 75 kN in the field tests, while the ultimate bearing capacity of conical foundations with the similar cross section at the soil surface was not achieved, even after 0.2 kN during laboratory tests with horizontal soil displacement and at a load of 100 kN in field tests.