Application of artificial intelligence in the detection and stratification of prostate cancer: Literature review

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.21638/spbu11.2023.204
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This review examines the current methodologies employed in utilizing artificial intelligence for the identification and classification of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging data. It outlines the volume of data utilized and highlights the most commonly sought-after sequences employed for training neural networks. The review further presents the accuracy metrics of the neural networks analyzed, accompanied by a succinct explanation of each metric. Furthermore, the review pinpoints the limitations associated with contemporary neural networks devised for the detection and classification of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging data, as well as the challenges encountered during their creation and implementation.In summary, this comprehensive analysis delves into the existing approaches in leveraging artificial intelligence for prostate cancer detection and stratification through magnetic resonance imaging data. It addresses the data scale and preferred magnetic resonance imaging sequences employed for neural network training. The review provides a breakdown of accuracy indicators for the neural networks evaluated, elucidating their respective capabilities. Moreover, the review identifies the drawbacks associated with current neural network models developed for prostate cancer detection and stratification via magnetic resonance imaging data, while also recognizing the complexities involved in their development and practical application.